W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Please review RDF Last Call

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 17:53:36 +0000
Message-ID: <3E3EACA0.2040104@hpl.hp.com>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


I am happy to follow up with Joe ...
Pat's text looks fine to me.

Jeremy

pat hayes wrote:

>
> Re. 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0162.html, 
> I'm afraid I do not understand what the issue is to which I am 
> expected to respond. The semantics document introduces the xsd:prefix 
> with the following text (section 0.2):
>
> "We will also make extensive use of the Qname prefixes rdf:, rdfs: and 
> xsd: defined as follows:
>
> Prefix rdf: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
>
> Prefix rdfs: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
>
> Prefix xsd: namespace URI: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
>
> Since Qname syntax is not legal N-triples syntax, and in the interests 
> of brevity and readability, we will use the convention whereby a Qname 
> is used without surrounding angle brackets to indicate the 
> corresponding uriref enclosed in angle brackets, eg the triple
>
> <ex:a> rdf:type rdfs:Property .
>
> should be read as an abbreviation for the N-triples syntax
>
> <ex:a> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> 
> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Property> ."
>
> Can someone (Jeremy?) tell me in what way this is misleading?
>
> Pat
Received on Monday, 3 February 2003 12:49:21 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:47 EDT