W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: xmlsch-02

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:42:14 +0100
Message-ID: <3F4CA726.1080600@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>>2) LC design - Xerces implementors have difficulty in passing tests
> How responsive are the Xerces group to suggestions? Is there an API
> addition or behaviour change that we could plausibly request of them?

I subscribe to their mailing list.

Bug reports do get seen too.
If this is perceived by them as a failure to implement the spec correctly 
then I would imagine that they treat it seriously.
However, not being able to point to an XML document and an XML Schema 
validation that is incorrectly processed we may find this gets ignored.

Moreover the parts of Xerces that do this are not part of their main APIs 
which are things like SAX and the DOM which do not separate out XML Schema 

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 09:05:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:07 UTC