W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: xmlsch-02

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 11:14:22 +0100
Message-ID: <3F4C847E.6060200@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


Actually in response to Patrick's latest on "pfps-06 on hold"


Choices may be:

1) Fudge - peter unhappy, can probably persuade WebOnt to be unhappy, 
difficult to defend WG decision

2) LC design - Xerces implementors have difficulty in passing tests

3) LC design, remove test cases
      Xerces implementors can pass all the tests may potential 
interoperability issues swept under carpet

4) change design - Patrick unhappy, increased distance between RDF 
datatyping and XML Schema Datatypes

5) Variant of Fudge - e.g. make it clear in the implemenation note that 
additional whitespace is an error, make producing a warning a SHOULD rather 
than a MAY. (Probably not enough to appease Peter, may head off others), 
could even make the implementation note informative and down case the MAYs 
and SHOULDs.

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2003 06:35:09 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:41 EDT