Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: [...] > > UGH! Please, no. > > If Peter or others are unhappy about our fudging, then we shouldn't > fudge, and we should take the stricter position that lexical forms > are lexical forms are lexical forms and no whitespace processing > is ever to be applied to any lexical form. Why is that preferrable? This has come up at all because the most commonly used library Xerces, implements the more forgiving function. It has been suggested we should not specify something that most implementations wont implement? In effect this suggestion arises from implementation feedback. Brian > > PatrickReceived on Tuesday, 26 August 2003 04:59:36 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:41 EDT