- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:42:38 +0100
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:13:25 +0100 (BST) Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > > Item 9: <br /> test case > > DaveB: we're strictly testing another spec, but this doesn't hurt. > > > > ACTION 20030808#1 jang add <br/> test case (without html namespace) > > ACTION 20030808#2 daveb feedback to raiser wrt <br/> test case > > This is now available as xml-canon/test001. I machine checked this (it's already approved) and it is correct. (It's not in the top level manifest yet, I assume that will be rebuilt soon). > I note that rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces contains embedded xhtml in pT=L > sections. JJC or DaveB (or a canonicalisation expert), could I ask that > you have a quick look at the NTriples files: > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces/test001.nt > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces/test002.nt Both correct visually and machine checked. Dave
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 06:42:48 UTC