W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Test case outstanding actions

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:57:19 +0100 (BST)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0308181010090.25941-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

These are up until the last meeting, the minutes of which I'm about to
produce.

I'll recreate the test case tables at the end of today.






19: test cases
2002-11-22#2  	jang  	[test case fix] remove RDFS entailment rules from
                         the language-ignored-for-numeric-types cases.
DONE, although this testis now obsolete due to datatype decisions.

2003-04-04#9  	jang  	Remove bagId tests from test cases.
done

20030425#2  	jang  	add test case for pfps-10 (from originating email)
DONE, test is under pfps-10/

20030509#12  	jang  	Review all tests to make changes concerning typed
                        literals

The following test cases are obsolete:
	language-important-for-non-dt-entailment-1
	language-important-for-non-dt-entailment-2

These are also similarly out-of-date:
	langauge-ignored-for-numeric-types-1
	language-ignored-for-numeric-types-2
	language-ignored-for-numeric-types-3

And this:
	language-and-xml-literal
	...since the NTriples are invalid (lang tags on XML Literal)

I no longer believe this test case to be true:
	semantic-equivalence-between-datatypes
	(that integer 1 = decimal 1.0 in XSD)
... seeking confirmation before I obsolete it.

Other XMLLiteral tests with langauge:
	none that were ever approved.


20030509#20  	jang  	Is inverse of test case 0097 true or not?
Good question. The message in question is
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0097.html
As per last week's telecon, the answer is "false", and we leave test
cases to that effect. However, JJC has a normative implementation
note addressing this.

20030627#6  	JanG  	add tests for intensional subClassOf semantics.
These are DONe, in horst-01/

20030718#7  	JanG  	update test case language-and-xml-literal to be
                        positive
This test case is obsolete since NTriples reflects teh abstract syntax;
there are no langauge tags on XMLLiterals. The datatypes/test001 parser
test captures this now.

2003-08-01#4  	jang:  	respond to daveR on his comments on testcases
DONE, see message [actually I can't find this, will follow up with
message number]
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 05:58:53 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:39 EDT