- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 23:26:54 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Jos De_Roo wrote: >>Right, I also believe that rdf.rdf is correct. >>I checked it with Cwm and Jena and compared it >>with what we assumed and found one difference >>which is >> rdf:predicate rdfs:range rdf:Property . >>where we had >> rdf:predicate rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . >>which we took from the "RDFS axiomatic triples" table >>in the "RDF Semantics Editors Draft July 31" >>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/#rdfs_interp >>I propose that the more precise triple is in the MT >>(both the table and the LBase translation). > >That looks plausible. Pat? My recollection is that we changed this from Property to Resource a while ago, for some reason that now escapes me. I have no objection to either. >Brian > >> >>-- >>Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ >> >> >> >> >> "Ralph R. >>Swick" >> <swick@w3.org> >>To: Brian McBride >><bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> >> Sent by: >>cc: rdf core >><w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> >> w3c-rdfcore-wg-req >>Subject: Re: Draft >>rdf.rdf >> >>uest@w3.org >> >> >> >> >> 2003-08-06 >>08:25 >> >>PM >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 11:52 AM 8/6/2003 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >> >>>I have attached such a draft. >> >> >>Looks good, Brian. (I didn't review it for completeness.) >> >>>It is a cut down version of rdfs.rdf with: >>> >>>- a new comment inserted to describe the document >> >> >>Why not put that text inside a dc:description property? >> >>>It uses only syntax defined in M&S, specifically, xml:base is not used. >> >>Ralph considered this important, at least until we get to rec. >> >>Yes, since you want to keep the original namespace name >>I feel that it would be inappropriate to use new syntax in any >>RDF content at that namespace URI until at least Proposed Rec. >> >>>Differences from the document at currently at the rdf namespace URI are: >>> >>>- labels are included for all terms >>>- the comments are consistent with those used in RDFS.rdf and the >> >>current specs >> >>>- an Owl ontology element has been added >>>- the list vocabulary rdf:List, rdf:nil, rdf:first and rdf:rest has been >> >>added >> >>>- the rdf:XMLLiteral class has been added. >>>- domain and ranges for rdf:value are specified for all properties >>>- there is an rdfs:subClassOf property for all classes >>>- there is an rdfs:isDefinedBy property for all terms >> >> >>All good things to have added. We didn't do it in the original >>content as RDFS wasn't available to us at the time. >> >>Thanks very much for doing this task, Brian. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 00:25:37 UTC