Re: reviewing pfps-11 proposed closure?

Dan Brickley wrote:
> Brian, (& everyone else),
> 
> Did you get a chance to review Peter's proposed closure for pfps-11?

I just did.  It loses all sense of what a statement means.

> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0014.html
> 
> I can live with the specific changes he proposes there, but have had 
> difficulty extrapolating from those examples to figure out what
> "[and so on]" would amount to. Suggestions?

I assume similar changes for predicate and object.

Brian