Brian McBride wrote: > At 09:20 30/04/2003 -0400, Frank Manola wrote: > > [...] > > >> "It is trivial to restore the triples for anyone who wants them fro a >> graph without them, using >> { ?x rdf:first ?y } => { ?x a rdf:List }." >> >> Or rather, whether this is true *in RDF* (as opposed to in OWL). > > > I'm assuming that rdf:first has an rdfs:domain of rdf:List so it would > be true in RDFS. Yes/No? I believe it would be true in RDFS as well (one of the reasons why it's a semantic extension). I'd need to make that distinction (since when the Primer discusses collections is hasn't gotten to Schema yet). --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 09:38:05 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:03 EDT