W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: ACTION 20030425#4 [was Re: timbl-03]

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:55:46 -0400
Message-ID: <3EAFD5E2.2050402@mitre.org>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

Brian McBride wrote:

> At 09:20 30/04/2003 -0400, Frank Manola wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
>> "It is trivial to restore the triples for anyone who wants them fro a
>> graph without them, using
>> { ?x rdf:first ?y } => { ?x  a rdf:List }."
>>
>> Or rather, whether this is true *in RDF* (as opposed to in OWL).
> 
> 
> I'm assuming that rdf:first has an rdfs:domain of rdf:List so it would 
> be true in RDFS. Yes/No?


I believe it would be true in RDFS as well (one of the reasons why it's 
a semantic extension).  I'd need to make that distinction (since when 
the Primer discusses collections is hasn't gotten to Schema yet).

 
--Frank


-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 09:38:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:03 EDT