Re: xmlsch-12 closure (was Re: Minutes of RDFCore telecon, 2003-04-25)

At 19:26 29/04/2003 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:

> >>>Jan Grant said:
>
>...
>
> > Item 13: xmlsch-12
> >       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0274.html
>
>I proposed to postpone it in this message.
>
> >   With amendment: strike "sucks because".
> >   With amendment: "the WG notes your offer of help and has asked the
> >       coordination group to carry it forward"
> >   PROPOSED to reject xmlsch-12 as detailed above
> >   prop daveb; second path; against 0; abstain 0
> >   RESOLVED
>
>This is recorded as a resolution to reject.
>
> >
> > ACTION 20030425#9 bwm postponed issue for xmlsch-12 (is it the same as 
> for -10?)
>
>This action hints it must have been a postponement.

I believe that is correct.

[...]

>PS (I need the postponed issue assigned URI before I can respond to
>xmlsch-10 or this)

There was one already that I've used

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf

I have updated it to refer to the xml last call comments.

Thanks for the reminder.

Brian