[...] >>That's more complicated than what I'm asking for. > >OK, I withdraw the suggestion. I agree it would be trivial to add rdfs:fyi. of course, I forgot what DanC suggested no doubt, it is trivial to add rdfs:fyi let's do that we tested successfully with rdfs:fyi rdfs:domain rdfs:Resource; rdfs:range rdfs:Resource. and {:rdf0} => {?S rdfs:fyi ?O}. in http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/rdfs-rules -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 18:51:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:03 EDT