W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Denotation of owl:Class

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:47:04 -0500
Message-Id: <p0521060abad067ba1d54@[]>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>>   If its ok to feed only
>>  some of the semantics to a DL reasoner, why not stick to rdfs:Class but let
>>  it have only a limited understanding of Class?
>I believe this statement is technically correct.
>i.e. globally replace owl:Class by rdfs:Class in OWL S&AS and everything still

Except that there would then be entailments that weren't legal in OWL-DL.

>You cannot say owl:Class rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class or the opposite in OWL
>Lite and OWL DL so the need for this distinction is moot.

But the point is that OWL-DL  needs a name for its universe that it 
can use. It can't define it, and probably OWL-Full can't either, in 

IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Saturday, 26 April 2003 12:47:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:05 UTC