W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

Re: completing the trawl of comments

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:59:00 -0400
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, connolly@w3.org
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20030425135900.GE12807@tux.w3.org>

* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-04-24 20:37+0100]
> 
> Folks have done a good job of picking up the loose comments identified by 
> Jan.  Thanks to all.  I think they all covered now except (possibly) those 
> below.
> 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0295.html
> [EricP's comment about examples in Primer. Frank's prompted him for
> reasons why; this is to do with nonopaqueness issue of URLs. No response
> from EricP but I think this is captured in other discussion]
> 
> Frank??
> 
> I have a recollection of seeing some traffic on this but can't find it in 
> the archive.  If I missed it sorry Frank.  Frank, do you think anything 
> more than a "closed given lack of response" is needed?
> 
> And on the vocabulary document:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0355.html
> [DanC on member and collection; recall this being discussed, can't find
> a closing message]
> 
> Danbri??

I'd be inclined to treat this as a comment against 'Semantics' WD (but with
knock on effect for RDFS WD). DanC, did subsequent discussion satisfy your 
concern, or should we open an issue for this?
> 
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0384.html
> [late, another question about creating a class for rdfs:Schema. No ack]
> 
> Danbri??

I've just sent a proposal to the list. Please open an issue to cover this, I'll reply 
to Daniel.

Dan


> Brian
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 09:59:07 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:01 EDT