Re: ACTION 2003-03-14#6: comments on semantics doc

>>Section 3.1, rdf:first, rdf:rest
>>
>>Would it not be appropriate to specify semantic conditions that IP contains
>>I(rdf:first), etc?
>>
>>Also, rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, rdf:object, rdf:_1, rdf:_2, ... , 
>>rdf:value ?
>
>This is now done in the version at the URI, ie
>
>http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_Editors.html
>
>which also now has a new figure 2 to match. Ive re-worded the 
>introductory paragraphs to section 3.2 to suit: mostly this is just 
>cut-and-paste reordering of the old text.
>
>To the best of my knowledge, this is now pretty close to complete, 
>and is modified to conform to all known comments, except for the 
>needed changes to the appendices, on which I will be working for a 
>few more days.  The links and anchors still need a bit of work.
>
>Brian, if you could archive this into the W3C space as the current 
>editor's draft that would be useful, then I can issue response 
>emails to the various comments. Thanks.

The version (dated 18b April) now at that URI has a modification to 
the monotonicity lemma (plus surrounding text) in section 3.5 (it was 
formerly in 3.4 and was wrong) , and has all the citations and RFC 
2119 vocabulary markup fixed to conform to the W3C style manual. 
Also Ive fixed an obscure bug in the CSS style sheet, so the glossary 
links are now unobtrusive.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam

Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 20:41:11 UTC