XMLLiterals and langauge tags ========================= gk >>a typed literal with a language tag >>is >>syntactically OK, path >yes >>but ill-formed, >no, it just has some redundant information in it Pat is right, he is also right to say > FWIW, seems to me that by trying to keep the syntax a wee bit simpler > we have made everything else a lot more complicated. I would like to > see lang tags purged from typed literals altogether, they seem to > play no useful role, even in XML (since you can always include them > in the actual XML document-character string, right?). I personally think we have 'new information' [1] in that the reagle decision allows a simplish resolution of pfps-08 to align XMLLiteral with the other datatypes, which then means that the lang tag would never be used on type literals and could be purged. I guess that procedurally that would be reopening reagle-01, reagle-02, pfps-08 - and it might be better to get on with the other issues first. (Even superficially related ones, such as danc-0? goofy literals, are orthogonal). Jeremy [1] "So finish the job! :-)" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0056.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 02:41:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:56 EDT