Re: Proposed response for timbl-02 (reification semantics)

> 
> Since referencing sources, provenence and suchlike is a trust centric
> application area, I am wondering whether we should have a 'Security 
> Considerations' <blink/> tag in our health warning for reification. Maybe
> that's overkill, but I do worry that it is all too easy to read properties
> such as 'source' as saying something like 'these uris were used in this 
> rdf document'. I think the OWL machinery gives us a way of showing that
> not to be workable...
> 


I could support 'Security  Considerations'



Jeremy