- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:50:01 -0400
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[snip] here's an idea re health warning. write a test case (would be a new kind of test case for us) that uses *OWL* semantics for inferring identity (eg. via InverseFunctionalProperty). The goal would be for inferences justified by the OWL rules to cause 'annoying' onclusions involving the resources named by rdf:predicate, :subject or :object properties. We could even ask TimBL if he could re-couch his concerns about the semantics using such an approach... I understand this would need a fwd reference to OWL, but since it would be a 'health warning' note for implementors rather than a formal rdf core test case I don't see that as a problem. Dan
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 09:03:14 UTC