- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:48:17 +0200
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "Patrick.Stickler" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "GK" <GK@NineByNine.org>, "jjc" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> For N-Triples, we are proposing that one case (lower) is required to > match the single case in the abstract syntax graph. > > This is already the case: > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#language > > So nothing need be done. Curses. I was going to object to changing N-triples definition in light of tex-01. I am hoist on my own petard. :( I suggest we end discussion on tex-01. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 04:48:59 UTC