W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Dave's disposition on RDF Core issues

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:31:37 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B5FBB71@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk]
> Sent: 04 April, 2003 16:46
> To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Dave's disposition on RDF Core issues
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I've trawled through the recent busy threads, and this is summarising
> for myself on the various issues and messages somewhere I can point
> to in the telcon.
> 
> Messages are relative to
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/
> unless otherwise stated.
>
> reagle-01, reagle-02
>   is this still live?  Patrick had problem with some of the words in
>   jjc's resolution.

I'm satisfied with Jeremy's response, and the quoted text, in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0185.html

> timbl-01 reification
>   I prefer it stays, people use it, was implemented
>   Might vote against removal at this stage.

I vote against removal. I think it should stay. We use it.

If it were removed, we'd have to then simply define an equivalent
set of terms, which would have less global acceptance (however
challenged the present definition of reification is).

> pfps-08 "XML Literals"
>   not convinced yet why change needed
>   0053 from PFPS CC:ed to the group had some reasons but 
> incoherent syntax
>   patrick 0074 part 1) - I could live with reverting to 
> previous XML"foo" form
>   patrick 0074 part 2) - I could live with dropping lang on 
> XML literals
>   find <rdf-wrapper> in the string ugly
> 
>   opposed - would vote no - on removing lang from plain literals (I
>     don't that is being proposed)

I don't think that is being proposed by anyone.

> jsr-118 - CC/PP
>   agree with suggesting CC/PP use RDF typed datatypes as in 
> Brian's 0037

I'm also happy with Brian's proposed response.

Patrick
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 09:31:41 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:52 EDT