It was closed last week, along similar lines: [[ 16:51:28 <danb_scribe> resolved: accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0155.html 16:51:43 <danb_scribe> (with 3 abstentions) 16:52:09 <bwm> amended to empaphasize that the proposed equals operation is inappropriate for the graph mechanism 16:52:28 <danb_scribe> oops (with 2 abstentions) ]] I have been waiting for the minutes in order to send the message to Tex. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Graham Klyne > Sent: 04 April 2003 13:26 > To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: tex-02, proposal to close > > > > With reference to: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#tex-02 > > and in view of: > http://www.w3.org/mid/3E8D48FB.72DFE4D8@i18nguy.com > > specifically: > [[ > 2) As for the issue of comparing literals, it would be good to > postpone the > issue. > ]] > > I propose that this issue be closed by postponing it for > consideration by a > future working group. > > #g > > > ------------------- > Graham Klyne > <GK@NineByNine.org> > PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E > >Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 08:34:15 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:52 EDT