W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2003

RE: tex-01 new proposal

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:31:44 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B01B90C6F@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk]
> Sent: 04 April, 2003 12:11
> To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> Cc: jjc; bwm; w3c-rdfcore-wg
> Subject: Re: tex-01 new proposal 
> 
> 
> >>>"Patrick.Stickler" said:
> > 
> > 
> > Just to check that I've understood this correctly:
> > 
> > > tex01/test002.rdf
> > > <rdf:RDF>
> > >  <rdf:Description xml:lang="en-US" eg:p="foo"/>
> > >  <rdf:Description xml:lang="en-us" eg:p="foo"/>
> > > </rdf:RDF>
> > 
> > results in 
> > 
> > > tex01/test002.nt
> > > _:a eg:p "foo"@en-US .
> > 
> > i.e., "en-us" -> "en-US" during parsing
> > 
> > Right?
> 
> no.

So the resulting graph will then be

   _:a eg:p "foo"@en-US .
   _:b eg:p "foo"@en-us .

?

Patrick


> Those are not parser (rdf/xml -> rdf graph) tests - they are model
> comparing tests.  No parser will implement them and they must not be
> added to the test cases as parser test cases.
> 
> I already asked the WG to stick with canonicalizing the lang tags
> values to 1 form.  I don't care what it is, as long as it is one way.
> Anything else makes simple RDF applications harder.
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 04:38:33 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:52 EDT