>>>Brian McBride said: > Sure; please can we have proposed resolution text to consider. I propose that the WG reject chas-01 "request to add aboutEachPrefix" on the grounds that the original reasons for removal remain valid: * We had good feedback that it lived badly in RDF and as such was little implemented or used. * It broke layering by looking inside URIs rather than dealing with them as identifiers. * Felt more like a RDF/XML syntax thing than part of the RDF model and as such it mixed badly with triples. * Worked badly with rdf:bagID - the interactions were never well understood. * Experienced practitioners recommended against using it. DaveReceived on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 12:19:30 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:50 EDT