Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision

At 11:58 27/09/2002 +0200, Sergey Melnik wrote:
>Brian McBride wrote:
>
>>At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>>
>>>I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics
>>>present their arguments to the WG in the same manner
>>>as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were
>>>asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote.
>>
>>That seems sensible.  I suggest we collect all the reasons for and 
>>against each proposal into the rationale document we started this week.
>
>
>Brian,
>
>how can "tidy" folks contribute to that document?

That is a pretty good start.

Brian