W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:32:37 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 11:58 27/09/2002 +0200, Sergey Melnik wrote:
>Brian McBride wrote:
>>At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>>>I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics
>>>present their arguments to the WG in the same manner
>>>as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were
>>>asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote.
>>That seems sensible.  I suggest we collect all the reasons for and 
>>against each proposal into the rationale document we started this week.
>how can "tidy" folks contribute to that document?

That is a pretty good start.

Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 06:35:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:00 UTC