W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 11:32:02 +0300
Message-ID: <009701c26600$5adea8d0$e180720a@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "ext Eric Miller" <em@w3.org>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>



[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>; "ext Eric Miller" <em@w3.org>
Sent: 27 September, 2002 10:21
Subject: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision


> At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> 
> >I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics
> >present their arguments to the WG in the same manner
> >as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were
> >asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote.
> 
> That seems sensible.  I suggest we collect all the reasons for and against 
> each proposal into the rationale document we started this week.  Would that 
> be acceptable Patrick?

Yes. I think so.

Patrick
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 04:32:15 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:04 EDT