W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-09-27

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:16:26 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <6356783.1033114434083.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-4>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Sep 27 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Sep 27 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is gk
Volunteer to scribe next week


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 4th Sept 2002


5: Minutes of 2002-09-20 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0263.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-09-06#1 bwm
get feedback to namespaces WG

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2002Sep/0011.html

ACTION: 2002-09-13#1 jjc
will send comments re namespace last call to appropriate group

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0068.html

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2002Sep/0011.html

ACTION: 2002-09-20#2 gk
Post references to his previous actions on "assertion"

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0267.html



7: Volunteers to review the HLINK Draft

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Sep/0108.html


8: Semantics of untyped Literals - Next Steps

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0313.html


9: Rationale for Literal Semantics Decision

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0251.html


10: Abstract Syntax for Untidy Literals 

2002-09-06#4 jjc review material thus far on specifics of
rdfs:Datatype, rdfs:Literal and the abstract syntax of literals and
produce a proposal for wording in the Abs. Syntax document.

2002-09-13#8 jjc update the abstract data model in concepts doc to
reflect the pair denoting a datatype literal

It seems that there is a key issue around whether literals are named or not.
    


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0198.html


11: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range
Jos has asked for this on the agenda

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0288.html


12: Proposed technical changes to RDFS model theory


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0169.html


13: Frank's new assertion text
2002-08-23#7  FrankM  Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract
                 model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of 
                 "assertion".


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html
  http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 04:16:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:04 EDT