Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision

At 22:21 26/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:


>I ask that the proponents of string-based (tidy) semantics
>present their arguments to the WG in the same manner
>as the proponents of value-based (untidy) semantics were
>asked to do prior ro last Friday's vote.

That seems sensible.  I suggest we collect all the reasons for and against 
each proposal into the rationale document we started this week.  Would that 
be acceptable Patrick?

Brian