[good archeology] > So while I understand that you still have a desire for some > form of "global string constant literal", other than a URIref, > you do not appear opposed to the idea of a distinctly labeled, > implicitly typed, untidy literal nodes which denote values > and not strings. of course not (just that "implicitly typed" is there too much, should better be "unknown typed" I guess) as that was "Brian's birthday present" you remember i.e. datatyped literals but with an explicit/unambiguous syntax besides that I think we need a clarification of that "global string constant literal" or "self-identifier" or "tidy literal" or "inline literal" or whatever you call it and I think (after rereading Sergey's messages several times) we are close to that -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 04:44:28 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:03 EDT