Re: On Consensus

(there is a typo in my last message)

[[[
It is difficult to justify why the bitsPerPixel "8" should (without the schema 
information) be viewed as unequal from the eg:name "8".

After we have read the schema, even the one with the comment and no range 
constraint; it seems that an RDF application would be justified in storing 
the bitsPerPixel as an int, and finding that it was equal to the eg:age and 
different from the 
]]

**bitsPerPixel** (wrong)

eg:name (was what I meant)

Jeremy