W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:28:05 +0200
To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDAECACAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com]
> Sent: 12 September 2002 16:24
> To: Jeremy Carroll
> Cc: ext Brian McBride; Patrick Stickler; RDF Core
> Subject: RE: Proposal for abstract syntax representation of inline
> literals (was Re: weekly call for agenda items)
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I suggest an abstract syntax along the lines of:
> >
> > An RDF Literal Node can be labelled with one of:
> >
> > - an RDF String Literal (as now)
> > - an RDF XML Literal  (as now)
> > - a value from the value space of a datatype.
> 
> so they are selfdenoting (as now)

What any literal denotes is a question for Pat not for me!

(or at least is not on-topic in this thread)

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 11:28:35 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:59 EDT