W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:04:34 +0200
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDGEBJCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



[[Discussion on values or datatype-lexical pairs in abstract syntax]]

We differ in opinion on this.
I don't believe it is vital one way of the other.
Can I ask the chair to table telecon time on this topic.

I think the test case would suffice as input.


Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 09:06:13 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jan Grant: "Re: Literals: language and xml (was: Comments on new datatyping document, part 1)"
Previous message: Brian McBride: "RE: Datatyping, reification, syntactic tidyness"
In reply to: Patrick Stickler: "Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case"
Next in thread: Patrick Stickler: "Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case"
Reply: Patrick Stickler: "Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:58 EDT