W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:22:50 +0300
Message-ID: <006601c254ce$a0baad60$294516ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "ext Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


OK, Mom  ;-)

(but he started it... ;-)

--
Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 50) 483 9453, patrick.stickler@nokia.com
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; "ext Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 05 September, 2002 13:32
Subject: Re: Proposals for changes to current datatyping spec


> At 13:15 05/09/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >Of course, that presumes we *are* modelling them as contextual
> >names, which of course is the crux of the whole untidy/tidy debate,
> >whether inline literals are global names or contextual names...
> 
> 
> Please can we focus on getting the part 1 datatypes stuff moving forward 
> and come back to tidyness issues later.  I'm hoping to keep part 1 moving 
> rapidly and am concerned about it getting distracted by a return to the 
> tidy/untidy debate.
> 
> Mother henish'ly
> Brian
> 
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 07:23:17 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:56 EDT