RE: Datatyping: moving away from "literal as 3-part thing" to "literal as dt+opaque bit"

At 13:09 04/09/2002 +0300, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

[...]

> >
> > I think the question might be:
> >
> >    Should the abstract syntax of a datatyped literal have an xml:lang
> > component?
>
>I did not know this was an open issue.

Then please could you clarify the issue you are discussing in this thread.

Brian