W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:28:54 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B160C2F@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

> Please just pick your favourite name to use in rdf: ...
> 
> I'd also suggest that rdfs:Datatype was better, 

How about

   rdf:datatype      Specifies an rdfs:Datatype

   rdfs:Datatype     The class of RDF compliant datatypes

???

If rdf:datatype gives you indigestion, then I think
that rdf:dtype is the next best.

Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 06:29:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:59 UTC