RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com]
> Sent: 02 September, 2002 15:44
> To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> Cc: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > (although I still think that it's better
> > > to have only primitive datatypes and describe
> > > the composed ones directly in RDF)
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow you. Examples?
> 
> (inspiration from http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/)
> 
>   _:a rdf:type eg:UKAddress .
> 
>   _:a eg:exportCode int"1" .
>   _:a eg:name "Helen Zoe" .
>   _:a eg:street "47 Eden Street" .
>   _:a eg:city "Cambridge" .
>   _:a eg:postcode "CB1 1JR" .
> 
> -- ,
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Right. Typed XML literals are now excluded from the core
proposal captured by part 1 of the latest specification.

Patrick