RE: Datatyping, rdf:type inappropriate

[...]

> 2. That those who think rdf:type should not be used, try
>    suggesting a better alternative (other than xsi:type).

I don't know, but couldn't it be something like
  ... rdf:Parsetype="Literal">
    <xsd:integer>10</xsd:integer>
  ...

(although I still think that it's better
to have only primitive datatypes and describe
the composed ones directly in RDF)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/