W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Copyright on xsd schema doc [was: Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF]

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:59:57 +0200
Message-ID: <002001c2978e$12f45d70$a09216ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Version with permissions to redistribute.

Patrick

[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 28 November, 2002 16:18
Subject: Copyright on xsd schema doc [was: Re: Action DanC? [was Re: More on XSD in RDF]


> At 09:30 26/11/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
> 
> >[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, 
> >patrick.stickler@nokia.com]
> >
> >
> > > It seems to me that what we need, as well as test cases, is an RDF Schema
> > > for XML Schema datatypes.
> >
> >Attached. I did this ages ago as part of the RDF datatyping design
> >process. It captures the type hierarchy defined by XML Schema part 2
> >as illustrated in the attached graphic (from the XML Schema spec).
> 
> Thanks for this Patrick.
> 
> I notice that the RDF Schema has a copyright statement reserving all rights 
> to Nokia.
> 
> Please would you clarify the copyright status of this document, e.g. 
> resubmit without the copyright notice.
> 
> Thanks
> Brian
> 


Received on Friday, 29 November 2002 05:00:06 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:11 EDT