- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:09:46 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 04:11 PM 11/20/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >>For multiple datatypes, the MT says this: >> >>[[ >>These rules do not support any entailments based on identity between >>values of different datatypes. An obvious generalization of the second >>rule would permit such conclusions, but questions of identity between >>items in value spaces of two different datatypes should be referred to >>the authorities who defined the datatypes. >>]] > >Oh yes, you are right. We are straying into specifying things about xsd >that are not up to us. OR... we are describing the consequences of those things specified elsewhere under the appropriate RDF+datatype-entailment? So the suggested entailments follow because of those specifications, not in spite of them. I think this can also apply to different-datatypes that are defined with overlapping value spaces. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 09:36:37 UTC