[...] > Moreover we see that > > xsd:int rdfs:subClassOf xsd:double . > > but not > > xsd:int rdfs:subClassOf xsd:float . > > by similar reading of the recommendation. > > (I am sorry Brian, I know you hate this. I tend to side with Dan in > principle, but also wonder about why we should want to do this. > I am not sure anyone would implement this). right, for :aaa :bbb "2147483648"^^xsd:int . => :aaa :bbb "2147483648"^^xsd:float . we actually are getting a ** Value was either too large or too small for an Int32. so besides those possible xsd-rules we think that builtin datatype handling such as comparing values is also needed -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Saturday, 23 November 2002 11:43:37 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:09 EDT