W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

RE: concept anchors - RE: Minutes: telecon 2002-11-15

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:02:11 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021121205931.0344e0d0@127.0.0.1>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

Well,

I'd hope nobody's referencing that one because it's been flagged as "due 
for the chop" for some time now.

In this case, I think it should probably go (with suitable warning to the 
other authors, of course)... publication checks will pick up any obsolete 
references, which, if they exist, should probably be removed.

Brian, the answer to your later question is the first paragraph above.  The 
corresponding material is being removed.  I think Jeremy has picked up a 
genuine exception to the eminently sensible general rule you have 
established concerning anchors.  If this has a knock-on effect on other 
documents, we have to deal with that.

#g
--


At 05:57 PM 11/21/02 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> >     5.1 Character normalization
> >     http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#xtocid48034
>
>character normalization has gone as promised.
>
>hence this link is conceptually broken.
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>Jeremy

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:33:56 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:08 EDT