- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 21 Nov 2002 12:31:19 -0600
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 10:46, Frank Manola wrote: > > Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > Anyone understand freenet? > > > > As far as I understand freenet URIs have an owner, who often wishes to > > remain anonymous. (Hence the use of freenet). > > > > Thus, putting too much weight on URIs having an authoritative owner Where do we put any weight on that? (please! put pointers to documents in review comments). (a) freenet is a fascinating exception to the administrative hierarchy idiom, (b) there are plent of much less exotic URIs that don't have easily identifyabl authoritative owners: e.g. news:comp.lang.python > > may put > > RDF on the side of centralist big corporate against the more anarchic p2p > > freedom loving hackers. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 13:31:21 UTC