Re: Hang on a second... Re: Datatype test cases: important ones (please have a look) from Brian McBride on 2002-11-21 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:06:24 +0000
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, "ext pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021121120534.07741e88@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 09:29 21/11/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>It should be changed/fixed. The above entailment should hold. Any
>application should be able to conclude that any two typed literals
>which have identical lexical form and datatype URI denote the
>same value, irrespective of any lang tag, and that conclusion should
>be possible without any special datatype knowledge. I.e., it's
>just an RDF entailment, not an RDF + datatypes entailment.

How do you know that datatype does not denote (i.e. is a pseudonym for) 
rdf:XMLLiteral?

Brian

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 07:05:01 UTC