W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:54:14 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021120175051.075c4258@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 17:27 20/11/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:

[...]


>Righto. It looks like the state of play is that the test cases for
>"duff" datatyped literals need a rethink, and I think I'm happier with
>why and how, now. Since Pat's given us a concrete "this is all you get"
>for the DT[xsd:integer]-closure from a duff datatyped literal, that's
>enough to rebuild those test cases. I'll sleep on it and come back
>tomorrow.

Cool.  Just a reminder of

<a> <b> "foo"^^xsd:integer

does not entail

<a> <b> _:v .
_:v rdf:type _:c .
_:c rdf:type rdfs:Datatype .

and it does if we replace "foo" with "10".

I'm not pushing this; there may be a better way.  Just that you don't have 
to do all the work on your own.

Brian
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 12:52:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:06 EDT