W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: do bad datatype literals denote [was Re: Datatype test cases ...]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:54:14 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 17:27 20/11/2002 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:


>Righto. It looks like the state of play is that the test cases for
>"duff" datatyped literals need a rethink, and I think I'm happier with
>why and how, now. Since Pat's given us a concrete "this is all you get"
>for the DT[xsd:integer]-closure from a duff datatyped literal, that's
>enough to rebuild those test cases. I'll sleep on it and come back

Cool.  Just a reminder of

<a> <b> "foo"^^xsd:integer

does not entail

<a> <b> _:v .
_:v rdf:type _:c .
_:c rdf:type rdfs:Datatype .

and it does if we replace "foo" with "10".

I'm not pushing this; there may be a better way.  Just that you don't have 
to do all the work on your own.

Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 12:52:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:02 UTC