- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:42:16 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 14:33 20/11/2002 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: [...] >If we do decide to keep it (grrrr) then I'd suggest formulating it >differently. The way this is put suggests that > > <a> <b> "10"^^xsd:integer . > >entails all other datatype representations of the same value. Suggest >instead: > > <a> <b> "10"^^xsd:integer . > <c> <d> "1E1"^^xsd:decimal . > >entails > > <a> <b> _:v . > <c> <d> _:v . > >which is more constrained. I just realized this applies to some of the earlier tests as well, e.g. <a> <b> "10"^^xsd:integer . <c> <d> "010"^^xsd:integer . entails <a> <b> _:v . <c> <d> _:v . Brian
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 10:40:50 UTC