Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-11-15

Brian--

I'd like to suggest that the order of the agenda items below be
interpreted somewhat flexibly since, modulo any content transfers to the
Primer determined in item 11, what remains to be done to the Primer is
much more dependent on what remains to be done to the other documents
than the other way around (I *am* in the process of identifying all that
needs to be done, though).

--Frank
 

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com wrote:
> 
snip
> 
> 11: Document overlap and content transfers
> 2002-11-01#3  frankm  Discuss overlap between primer & concepts with
>               concepts editors
> 
> See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0422.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0424.html
> 
> 12: Primer
> 2002-04-19#16  danbri  review effect of containerMembershipProperty superproperty on primer
> 2002-05-03#4  em  liase with danbri to ensure primer and schema stay in sync over the isDefinedBy issue
> 2002-09-13#5  FrankM  update primer to reflect datatype concensus
> 
> What remains to be done to the primer?
> What is the editors plan?
> 
> 
> 13: Concepts Doc
> What needs to be done?
> Plan to last call
> 
> 14: Syntax Document
> 2002-11-01#2  emiller  arrange publication of syntax with DaveB
> What needs to be done?
> What is the editor's plan
> 
> 
> 15: Schema
> 2002-06-17#1  danbri  Update RDFS spec to reflect resolution of
>                       rdfms-seq-representation
> 2002-06-17#5  danbri  Update the schema spec to reflect the resolution of
>                       rdfs-isDefinedBy.
> 2002-06-17#6  danbri  Add to the schema document a comment clarifying the
>                       relationship between the idea that there is exactly one
>                       namespace or schema associated with a property and the
>                       rdfs:isDefinedBy property.
> 2002-06-17#7  danbri  Update the schema spec to account for editorial issues
>                       listed under rdfs-editorial.
> 2002-06-18#1  danbri  republish the current rdf schema to the current rdf
>                       schema uri
> 2002-07-12#6  danbri  try to move sec 5 to schema doc
> 2002-09-13#3  Danbri  update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect
>                       datatype concensus
> 2002-11-01#14  danbri Contact jjc/gk to ask them to review schema draft
> 
> What needs to be done?
> What is the plan?
> 
> 
> 16: Model Theory
> 2002-02-25#18  bwm  ensure model theory updated to reflect semantics of
>                     rdf:value
> 2002-06-17#4  patH  Update the model theory to specify that rdfs:isDefinedBy
>                     is an rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:seeAlso.
> 2002-09-13#4  PatH  to update model theory to cover 4 to reflect datatype
>                     consensus
> What remains to be done?
> What is the editor's plan?
> 
> 
> 
> 17: Testcases
> 2001-10-26-#1 bwm  make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision
> 2002-02-25#9  JanG  Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD
> 2002-04-05#5  Jeremy  write test cases for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
> 2002-04-19#14 danc  do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains
> 2002-04-19#18 jan  produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
> 2002-06-07#3  JanG  Fold in the consensus test cases and bring back the rest to the group
> 2002-06-07#4  JanG  Update the test case problems reported by JeremyC and DaveB
> 2002-05-31#3  JanG  Update test case document with tests for parseType collection
> 2002-09-13#6  Jan  create testcase to reflect datatype concensus
> 2002-09-20#1  jjc  Produce test case domain and range.
> 2002-10-11#1  janG  add test cases from msg Oct/0098
> 2002-11-01#11 DanC  Create test cases for non datatyped simple literals
> 
> What remains to be done?
> What is the editor's plan
> 


-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752

Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 13:16:26 UTC