RE: mt comments attached this time.

A quick comment that Brian's proposed rule:

xxx rdf:type rdf:Seq .

_:xxx rdf:_nnn _:yyy .

entails

_:xxx rdf:_mmm _:zzz .

when nnn > 1 and mmm = nnn-1

was one that I had thought we had decided against ...

Pat,

if you do add it in this round please include a comment that it's still in
discussion.

Oh, and BTW, you got the hang of those SHOULDs pretty quickly!

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Brian McBride
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 8:53 PM
> To: RDF Core
> Subject: mt comments attached this time.
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 17:14:15 UTC