Nonsense. I've got it the wrong way round. Brian At 18:28 11/11/2002 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >Ok, usual caveats about lack of expertise. > >I'm concerned about the definition of an instance of graph and the >instance lemma. > >The definition of instance of seems to say that > ><ex:a> <ex:b> _:xxx . >_:xxx <ex:isDistinctFrom> _:xxx > >is an instance of: > ><ex:a> <ex:b> _:xxx . ><ex:a> <ex:b> _:yyy . >_:xxx <ex:isDistinctFrom> _:yyy . > >I'm not sure webont would like the latter entailing the former. > >BrianReceived on Monday, 11 November 2002 13:34:51 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:04 EDT