Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDF S axioms] from Brian McBride on 2002-11-11 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:43:44 +0000
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021111111302.027301d8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 12:47 11/11/2002 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:

>So it would seem to me that insofar as the abstract syntax
>and MT are concerned, literals would be valid subjects.

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects

[[Resolution: On the 15th February 2002, at the RDFCore WG telecon, the WG:

     * resolved that the current syntaxes (RDF/XML, n-triples, graph 
syntax) do not allow literals as subjects.
     * noted that it is aware of no reason why literals should not be 
subjects and a future WG with a less restrictive charter may extend the 
syntaxes to allow literals as the subjects of statements.
]]

Brian

Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 06:42:14 UTC