W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:38:09 +0100
To: "Graham Klyne <GK" <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD036DF68.C7D16EEC-ONC1256C6C.004FF68F-C1256C6C.0050703C@agfa.be>


well Graham, it is just a rdfs:Resource
not a rdfs:Class nor a rdf:Property
kind of an individual being a rdf:List
and lowercase is OK I would say

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/


                                                                                                                        
                    Graham Klyne                                                                                        
                    <GK@NineByNine.org>       To:     RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>                               
                    Sent by:                  cc:                                                                       
                    w3c-rdfcore-wg-requ       Subject:     Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil...                                 
                    est@w3.org                                                                                          
                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                        
                    2002-11-09 01:36 PM                                                                                 
                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                        





... in keeping with the conventions for object and property names?

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 09:39:02 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:01 EDT