W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 13:20:10 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021109131922.0205afb8@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


At 10:52 09/11/2002 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

[...]


><eg:a> <eg:p> "a" .
>=>
><eg:a> <eg:p> _:b .
>
>entailment.

That just means a bnode matches a resource or a literal.

Brian

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2002 08:17:34 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Graham Klyne: "Should rdf:nil be rdf:Nil..."
Previous message: Brian McBride: "Thumbs down to schema"
In reply to: Jeremy Carroll: "Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms]"
Next in thread: pat hayes: "Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms]"
Reply: pat hayes: "Re: Literals are resources [was Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms]"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:01 EDT