On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:37 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: >> It is important that we are clear that we are not claiming to conform >> to rfc 2396. > what!?!??! I thought you were OK with this; you were for making RDF URIs Unicode strings, which is a clear violation of RFC2396. That decision is recorded in the Concepts WD: "A URI Reference Label within an RDF graph (an RDF URI reference) is a Unicode string [UNICODE]" - http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20020829/#section-Graph-URIref -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com] "Curb your consumption," he said.Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 22:41:35 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:53:58 EDT